Peer Review Policy

The Journal of Humanities and Applied Sciences relies on a peer review system to ensure the quality of the published research. All submitted manuscripts undergo a thorough evaluation by experts specialized in the respective scientific field.

Key features of the policy:
• Double-Blind Peer Review: Reviewers do not know the authors’ identities, and authors do not know the reviewers’ identities, ensuring impartiality and fairness in the evaluation process.
• Reviewer Selection: Reviewers are chosen based on their academic expertise and professional specialization to guarantee accuracy and quality in the evaluation.
• Evaluation Criteria: Manuscripts are assessed based on their originality, scientific significance, methodological rigor, clarity of results, and accuracy of the references used.
• Feedback to Authors: Authors receive detailed review reports that help them improve the quality of their research before final acceptance for publication.
• Impartiality and Integrity: The journal ensures there are no conflicts of interest and maintains complete confidentiality of the reviewers’ comments and evaluation outcomes.

This policy aims to enhance the quality of published research, strengthen the journal’s credibility, and ensure compliance with international scientific standards.